Proposed Nutrition Labels Could Change Child Obesity As We Know It



How often do you look at the nutrition information on the back of a food product?  We’ve all done it.  We’re concerned about what we’re eating so we turn the package or box over and look at the “important” information: the calories and fats.  But have you ever paid attention to the sugars?  After this, I bet you’ll start.

The article “Nutrition Facts Labels May Soon Include Added Sugar Info; Food Companies Protest Despite Risks Of Obese, Diseased America”  by Samantha Olsen explains the new proposed nutrition label by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  As of now, nutrition labels don’t include the amount of added sugars.  The amount of sugars listed is a combination of both the natural sugars and added sugars.  In the new proposed label, these two amounts will be separate to clearly define how many natural and how many added sugars are in the product.

In 2006,  there was a requirement for food companies to display the amount of trans fats on nutrition labels.  Times change and since the nutrition label was first introduced twenty years ago, we’ve gained a lot more insight into what is harmful to our bodies.  Trans fats needed to be included because of the risk and harm involved with eating them.  Now that we have gained insight into the risks of added sugars, it is time for them to be displayed as well.

The FDA states, “Many experts recommend consuming fewer calories from added sugar because they can decrease the intake of nutrient-rich foods while increasing calorie intake.”  To simplify,   the human body can use sugars up to a certain extent, passed that point the leftover amount of un-used sugars are stored as fat.

The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends that American women should have no more than 6 teaspoons of sugar a day, and men no more than 9 teaspoons.  Although there is no specific amount for children, one can assume the recommended amount would be less than a woman’s.  In the average soft drink, there are about 10 teaspoons of sugar.  Americans are consuming way beyond their recommended amounts of sugar daily, causing a lot of sugars to be stored as fats

Children are especially at risk to become negatively affected from added sugars.  Many food companies have resulted in aiming their advertisements for their products at children.  Kids are also targeted in the grocery stores.  The unhealthy products that scream, “Eat me!” to kids are placed on the lower shelves, making them at eye level to children.  This makes the unhealthy foods hard for kids to resist, and hard for parents to say no to.

There are many people that say in order to lose weight you need to eat healthier and eat less.  Although it is never a bad idea to choose healthier options, a major part of it is people need to eat less sugars.  In order to do so, knowing the amount of evil, added sugars included in the items consumers want to buy for their kids, or themselves, would be helpful.

Image source:


One thought on “Proposed Nutrition Labels Could Change Child Obesity As We Know It

  1. It truly is wonderful to see the great strides that have been made in the world of nutrition. I do agree, that there is still so far to go. After reading your incredibly informative post, it made me think that although I consider myself pretty healthy, I don’t know if I truly know how to decipher an nutrition label in its entirety. In regards to sugar, I know I often take a look at the label, and see how much sugar there is, I don’t truly know what that means. It certainly is news to me that women should have no more than six teaspoons a day. This post was really eye opening. It made me truly think about what I am putting in my body and also how deceiving nutrition labels can be.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s